TTAB is seeking input on the current Standard Protective Order

IBM and Gilead support the current Standard Protective Order.

Gilead and IBM thank the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Office”) for the opportunity to comment on the TTAB Standard Protective Order (“SPO”). We appreciate that the current SPO includes a designation for “Attorney’s Eyes Only” that excludes in-house counsel. We think that the outside counsel only designation is especially important in trademark proceedings.

Gilead and IBM believe that “Attorney’s Eyes... more »

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

TTAB is seeking input on the current Standard Protective Order

Standard Protective Order

31 January 2018

Honorable Mary Boney Denison
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Trial and Appeals Board
Commission of Trademarks
600 Dulany Street
Alexandria, VA 22314

Re: Comments on Revising TTAB’s Standard Protective Order

Commissioner Denison:

The TTAB Policy Collaboration Site has issued a request for comments relating to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s Standard Protective Order (“SPO”) in effect... more »

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active

TTAB is seeking input on the current Standard Protective Order

AIPLA Comments on TTAB's Standard Protective Order

January 2, 2018

The Honorable Gerald F. Rogers
Chief Administrative Trademark Judge
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313–1451

Via email: gerard.rogers@uspto.gov

Re: AIPLA Comments to the current TTAB Standard Protective Order,
effective June 24, 2016

Dear Judge Rogers,

The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) is pleased to... more »

Voting

0 votes
0 up votes
0 down votes
Active